Blog Culture@Work
Welcome! My name is Joost Thissen and here I like to share cultural columns and insights for those of us who are interested in culturally diverse and global workplaces.
Welcome! My name is Joost Thissen and here I like to share cultural columns and insights for those of us who are interested in culturally diverse and global workplaces.

Global mobility has long been seen as a strategic lever for growth—enabling organisations to deploy talent, transfer knowledge, and build international leadership pipelines. Yet despite significant investment, many international assignments fail to deliver expected outcomes.
The reason is rarely technical capability. More often, the gap lies in cultural preparedness and unexpected culture shock.
Research consistently shows that expatriate failure rates range from 10% to over 40%, with cultural adaptation, not technical ability, as the primary cause. Between 20–40% of expatriates return early, often due to difficulties adjusting for themselves or their families.
Even when assignments run their full course, success is not guaranteed. An additional 30–50% of assignees underperform due to cultural challenges; what many organisations now recognise as “functional failure.”
The financial implications are significant. A single failed assignment can cost between AUD $350,000 and $1.4 million when factoring in relocation, lost productivity, and replacement costs.
What this means for HR and Global Mobility leaders:
Sending unprepared employees and families on assignment is not just a people risk; it is a material business risk. Cultural readiness must be treated as a core component of mobility strategy, not an optional add-on.
Despite globalisation, cultural and language barriers remain deeply impactful.
Surveys of expatriates reveal:
Yet, many organisations still select international assignees based predominantly on technical expertise or functional performance. This creates a fundamental mismatch.
Implication for leadership and recruitment:
Success in a domestic role does not automatically translate into success in a global context. Cultural agility must be assessed and developed with the same rigour as technical skills.
Thriving in a new cultural environment requires more than awareness—it demands capability.
Intercultural training helps employees and their families:
These skills, often referred to as cultural agility, intercultural competence, or cultural intelligence, are strongly linked to faster adjustment and stronger on-assignment performance.
Importantly, these are not innate traits. They can and must be developed.
Implication for talent strategy:
Organisations that invest in building intercultural competence are not just supporting mobility—they are building globally capable leaders.
Intercultural training is often viewed as a “soft” investment. The data tells a different story.
Organisations that prioritise cultural readiness report:
Conversely, culturally misaligned teams can underperform by as much as 36–40%. This is a direct link to productivity, work quality, and financial outcomes.
Implication for HR metrics:
Intercultural competence should be measured and tracked as a performance driver—not just a learning initiative.
One of the most overlooked factors in global mobility success is the well-being of the employee and their family.
Cultural transition can be emotionally taxing, leading to stress, disengagement, and, early return or resignation.
Intercultural support plays a critical role in:
Given that employee turnover can cost 150–200% of annual salary, the case for a more holistic approach is clear.
Implication for talent strategy:
A successful mobility program must go beyond logistics and compliance. It must actively support the human experience of relocation.
If organisations want to unlock the full value of global mobility, they need to shift their mindset:
Global mobility success is not determined when the plane lands—it is determined by how well people adapt, connect, and perform once they arrive.
Cultural readiness is no longer a “nice to have.” It is a strategic necessity.